SUMMARY: From Solaris 2.6 to 8 : Upgrade or Fresh Install

From: DAUBIGNE Sebastien - BOR ( SDaubigne_at_bordeaux-bersol.sema.slb.com ) <SDaubigne_at_bordeaux-bersol.sema.slb.com>
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:05:40 EST
The general consensus is to do a fresh install if possible because :
-	it's faster.
-	you keep the hand on the entire process.
-	you avoid junk being left over by the upgrade procedure.

Thanks to Pablo Jejcic, Richard Hampshire, Pascal Grostabussiat, Bill
Voight, Thomas Cameron, David Arroyo, Colin Bigam.

---
Sebastien DAUBIGNE
sdaubigne@bordeaux-bersol.sema.slb.com
<mailto:sdaubigne@bordeaux-bersol.sema.slb.com>  - (+33)5.57.26.56.36
SchlumbergerSema - SGS/DWH/Pessac

	-----Message d'origine-----
	De:	DAUBIGNE Sebastien  - BOR (
SDaubigne@bordeaux-bersol.sema.slb.com )
	Date:	lundi 10 mars 2003 11:15
	@:	'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org'; 'sunhelp@sunhelp.org'
	Objet:	From Solaris 2.6 to 8 : Upgrade or Fresh Install

	I plan to move a server (E6500) from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8 (64
bits).

	What do you recommend :
-	Upgrade Solaris 2.6 using Sun upgrade procedure (with LU or simply
with the installation CD), then upgrade other software not supported under
Solaris 8 ?
-	Make a fresh install on a new disk, then install all other software
on it ?

	My fear is that Sun upgrade could leave unnecessary files in various
directories or legacy config options (/etc/system or others).
	So I'm more confident with a clean fresh install, but I'm open to
any advice.

	I will summarize.
	---
	Sebastien DAUBIGNE
	sdaubigne@bordeaux-bersol.sema.slb.com
<mailto:sdaubigne@bordeaux-bersol.sema.slb.com>  - (+33)5.57.26.56.36
	SchlumbergerSema - SGS/DWH/Pessac
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
Received on Mon Mar 10 13:16:43 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 03 2016 - 06:43:04 EST