Special thanks to Martin D. Baldenegro for the prompt response.
_____________________ Original Messages ______________________
=> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 10:48:34 +0800 (SGT)
=> From: Amos Lim <amoslim@csah.com>
=> Subject: QHA+ y2k compliance
=> To: sun-managers@sunmanagers.ececs.uc.edu
=>
=> Hi Gurus,
=>
=> This is a bit off topic.
=> A few months ago the www.qualix.com web page mentioned that QHA+ ver 1.72A
and
=> above is y2k compliance. Now, it only mentions that ver 2.2 is y2k
compliance.
=> Does it mean that 1.72A is no more y2k compliance? Hope someone who know
=> can share with me the answer or point me to the correct website. Thanks.
=>
=>
=> regards,
=> Amos
=>
=>
------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 20:37:22 -0700 (MST)
From: "Martin D. Baldenegro (RRNC)" <mdb@dosmanos.cwiz.com>
Subject: Re: QHA+ y2k compliance
To: amoslim@csah.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-MD5: +nWQXevtHBn5W1tnQHqtWw==
Amos,
QHA+ version 1.72a is Y2K compliant. QHA+ does not use any
code that requires the date. Also there is a new version for
Solaris, version 2.3. Please feel free to email me at Legato
if you need more information, my email is mdb@legato.com
Hope this helps,
/mdb
Martin D. Baldenegro
Director
Technical Marketing for Data Availability
Legato Systems, Inc.
=====================================================================
Martin D. Baldenegro (RRNC) E-mail: mdb@cwiz.com
=====================================================================
" Do Not Squander Time, For That Is The Stuff Life Is Made Of "
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:13:34 CDT