Several weeks ago I posted a request for information about SCSI
Floppy disk drives available for Sun Sparcstations, specifically for
the new SLC.  I received the following information from various
people:
   Artecon
   2440 Impala Drive
   Box 9000
   Dept. 5500
   Carlsbad, California 92008-0993
   1-800-USA-ARTE
   Central Data
   1602 Newton Drive
   Champaign IL 61821
   1-800-482-0315
   Aurora Technologies
   1-617-577-1288
   Micronet Technology
   20 Mason
   Irvine, CA
   1-714-837-6033
   Workstations Plus
   1615 Alvarado St.
   San Leandro, CA 94577
   1-800-735-5777
   Acropolis Systems
   1638 Centre Point Dr.
   Milpitas, CA 95035
   1-408-946-6947
   Dataram
   P.O. Box 7528
   Princeton, NJ 08543
   1-800-822-0071
   Clearpont Research Corp.
   35 Parkwood Dr.
   Hopkinton, MA 01748-1659
   1-800-clearpt
All of these companies apparently sell Floppy Disk Drives that will
operate on the SCSI bus of Sun Workstations and are selling it for
about $995.  Why so much?  After talking with several of the
salepeople at these companies, I have found that they are selling
the physical device AND a set of programs to access the disk and use
it with MS-DOS files.  This bothers me.  What it comes down to is
that they do not sell the device and a driver but instead expect you
to shell out $$$ for software that DUPLICATES standard unix software
like tar, bar, etc.  Furthermore, the MS-DOS stuff that they provide
duplicates DOS-Windows as distributed by Sun but does not do the
IBM-PC emulation to run programs. 
So I would end up buying a unix license for standard software, the
disk drive and the accompanying software which I will never use and
DOS-Windows.  This is ridiculous when all I want is the physical
device and a kernel -  total price should be about $300-$400 or less.
A couple of people suggested that I consult an attorney based on the
fact that the Sun sales literature claims that the device would be
supported like other devices are supported.  I did consult with an
attorney about this but am left with the opinion that if I sued, I
would likely lose since the case would essentially be my word
against Sun's and the documentation that states otherwise is not
sufficient because it is worded ambiguously.  You or I might know
what it meant but, a judge or jury would likely not.
So the end result is that I am left with a Sun workstation that I
can use for some things but not everything I wanted it for, I will
likely not be able to purchase any new software because most vendors
are now distributing software on either CD-Roms (far too expensive
for me to consider) or floppies, neither of which I can use, and I
will not be able to share software or files with other people unless
they can read a 1/4" data cartridge tape (not likely for my
purposes).  
I am also left with a very bad taste in my mouth.  If it sounds as
if I'm bitter, I am.  I just spent about $8,000 on a Sun Workstation
and hard disk drive only to find out that I may have to spend
another $2,000 - $4,000.  At this point, I'm seriously considering
selling the Sun and buying something else (like an IBM-PC).
-- --- Saul Jaffe Rutgers University ARPA: Jaffe@elbereth.rutgers.edu UUCP: ...!rutgers!elbereth.rutgers.edu!jaffe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:06:10 CDT