SUMMARY: QHA+ y2k compliance

From: Amos Lim (
Date: Mon Dec 06 1999 - 22:36:42 CST

Special thanks to Martin D. Baldenegro for the prompt response.

_____________________ Original Messages ______________________
=> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 10:48:34 +0800 (SGT)
=> From: Amos Lim <>
=> Subject: QHA+ y2k compliance
=> To:
=> Hi Gurus,
=> This is a bit off topic.
=> A few months ago the web page mentioned that QHA+ ver 1.72A
=> above is y2k compliance. Now, it only mentions that ver 2.2 is y2k
=> Does it mean that 1.72A is no more y2k compliance? Hope someone who know
=> can share with me the answer or point me to the correct website. Thanks.
=> regards,
=> Amos

------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------

Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 20:37:22 -0700 (MST)
From: "Martin D. Baldenegro (RRNC)" <>
Subject: Re: QHA+ y2k compliance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-MD5: +nWQXevtHBn5W1tnQHqtWw==

  QHA+ version 1.72a is Y2K compliant. QHA+ does not use any
  code that requires the date. Also there is a new version for
  Solaris, version 2.3. Please feel free to email me at Legato
  if you need more information, my email is
  Hope this helps,
Martin D. Baldenegro
Technical Marketing for Data Availability
Legato Systems, Inc.

          Martin D. Baldenegro (RRNC) E-mail:
   " Do Not Squander Time, For That Is The Stuff Life Is Made Of "

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:13:34 CDT