SUMMARY RE: in.named troubles... (clarification)

From: Adrian Stovall (adrians@solarsystems.com)
Date: Tue Sep 07 1999 - 09:19:50 CDT


I wrote previously (as noted below), and recieved suggestions from Sean
Quaint and Carl Brewer. Sean noted that the "domain" entry I placed in
named.boot was unneeded, and Carl noted that a "domain" entry should be in
resolv.conf (which it was, as I wrote). I no longer have my unknown
directive error, thanks to this advice, but my primary problem (only
non-authoritative responses for FQDN's on what should be the authoritative
server, and the "no NS RRs....etc" error when in.named starts. I got
almost all of my DNS setup tutorial from a ZDJournals article, but can
still find no other substantial source of information.

Still looking for help, if any is to be found.
Adrian Stovall

> I'm having trouble getting my nameserver to behave. On a self-contained
> network, I have one machine which I designated as my primary nameserver.
> My problem is first apparent during boot when in.named starts.
>
> I see:
>
solved------ > <time/date>...named[165]: starting named 4.9.4-P1
solved------ > "" "" /etc/named.boot:
line 8: unknown
solved------ > directive "domain"
> "" "" Zone "solarsys.com" (file
> db.solarsys.com): no NS RRs found at zone top
> "" "" primary zone "solarsys.com"
> rejected due to errors (serial 1)
>
> As near as I can tell, the problem is between the version of named I'm
> using, and the format of my named.boot file, but I'm not certain
>
> named.boot looks like:
>
> directory /var/named
> domain solarsys.com
> primary solarsys.com db.solarsys.com
> primary 0.0.4.in-addr.arpa db.4.0.0
> primary 0.0.6.in-addr.arpa db.6.0.0
> primary 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa db.127.0.0
> primary 160.168.192.in-addr.arpa db.192.168.160
>
> resolv.conf looks like:
>
> domain solarsys.com
> nameserver 4.0.0.1
>
> db.solarsys.com looks like
>
> ; db.solarsys.com
> @ IN SOA bugs.solarsys.com root.bugs.solarsys.com (
> 1
> 10800
> 3600
> 604800
> 86400 )
>
> IN NS bugs.solarsys.com.
>
> bugs IN A 4.0.0.1
> .......(etc)
>
> any help would be appreciated
>
> "Murphy was an optomist." -O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
 

begin 600 squaint.vcf
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#9 T*
`
end



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:13:25 CDT