Looks like my summary was not clear enough.
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 1998 5:06 PM
To: Sirisena, Navi
Subject: RE: SUMMARY: in.rlogind & in.rsh on 2.6
I was
wondering how missing entries in the host table would affect
processes that
start in inetd? I don't see the connection.
Answer:
> Well we use NIS and the host table on NIS for this machine was pointing to
> a diff. IP address. since rsh <hostname> looks up either the local host
> table or NIS host table ( if NIS ) on the host I am coming from, rsh
> failed.
>
> It has nothing to do with inetd after all.
>
> Navi
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 1998 5:06 PM
> To: Sirisena, Navi
> Subject: RE: SUMMARY: in.rlogind & in.rsh on 2.6
>
> I was
> wondering how missing entries in the host table would affect processes
> that
> start in inetd? I don't see the connection.
>
>
>
> On Monday, June 08, 1998 4:57 PM, Sirisena, Navi
> [SMTP:Navi.Sirisena@gs.com]
> wrote:
>
> > I have a machine ( Solaris 2.6 ) that none of these services are
> working.
> > inetd.conf file reflects the default entries. When I try to rsh it times
> > out.
> > When I do a ps I can't find the service running either. Can someone help
> me
> > out? .rhosts files are inplace as well.
> > what am I missing?
> >
> > Very Simple:
> > I had a missing entry on my hosts table. I had moved the machine around
> a
> > couple of times.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:12:41 CDT