Thanks to Ian Parkin, who suggested tcopy. It was a good idea which
didn't work directly, but led me to a solution.
Also to:
Art Freeman, James Brigman, Jim Roy and Karl Vogel.
Still strange. tcopy reported that there were 3 x 80-byte records on the
tape.
I used: dd if=/dev/nrst1 of=file1 conv=ascii,notrunc,noerror and I
extracted what seemed to be a tape header.
I used tcopy again at this point but it said that the EOT had been
reached.
But when I eventually tried the dd command as above, but added bs=13200,
many records were extracted. Smaller block sizes were useless (nothing
extracted) and larger ones work as well. I guess knowing how the data
was recorded is crucial - and we didn't know it.
I don't know why tcopy couldn't see that there were more records on the
tape, and I don't know why the default block size wasn't enough to read
all the data. But I can read *some* data off the tapes, so I'm thankful.
Doc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:12:36 CDT